World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Ralf Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent und Markenamt

Article Id: WHEBN0002257410
Reproduction Date:

Title: Ralf Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent und Markenamt  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Court of Justice of the European Union, European Court of Justice, Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt, Supremacy (European Union law), European Union Civil Service Tribunal
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Ralf Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent und Markenamt

Ralf Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent und Markenamt
Submitted 10 July 2000
Decided 12 December 2002
Full case name Ralf Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt
Case number C-273/00
ECLI ECLI:EU:C:2002:748
Case type Reference for a preliminary ruling
Chamber Full court
Nationality of parties Germany
Procedural history Bundespatentgericht, Vorlagebeschluss vom 14 April 2000 (33 W (pat) 193/99)
1. Article 2 of Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that a trade mark may consist of a sign which is not in itself capable of being perceived visually, provided that it can be represented graphically, particularly by means of images, lines or characters, and that the representation is clear, precise, self-contained, easily accessible, intelligible, durable and objective.

2. In respect of an olfactory sign, the requirements of graphic representability are not satisfied by a chemical formula, by a description in written words, by the deposit of an odour sample or by a combination of those elements.
Court composition
Legislation affecting
Interprets Directive 89/104/EEC

In trademark law, Sieckmann v German Patent and Trademark Office (case C-273/00) issued on December 12, 2002, is widely recognised as a landmark decision of the European Court of Justice on the graphical representation of non-conventional trademarks under the European Trade Marks Directive.

The case involved a "methyl cinnamate" scent, which the applicant had described "as balsamically fruity with a slight hint of cinnamon". The ECJ ruled that (a) a chemical formula depicting this scent did not represent the odour of a substance, was not sufficiently intelligible, nor sufficiently clear and precise; (b) a written description was not sufficiently clear, precise and objective; and (c) a physical deposit of a sample of the scent did not constitute a graphic representation, and was not sufficiently stable or durable.

The case illustrates difficulties with the graphical representation of scent marks, as the ECJ held that these representations, whether individually or collectively, could not satisfy this requirement.

External links

  • The decision
  • The opinion of Advocate General Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer
  • Non-conventional trademarks directory
  • Fresh version of Non-conventional trademarks directory
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.