World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

M18 Hellcat


M18 Hellcat

76 mm Gun Motor Carriage M18
Type Tank destroyer
Place of origin United States
Service history
In service 1944–57 (United States)
Production history
Manufacturer Buick division of General Motors
Produced July 1943–October 1944
Number built 2,507
Weight 17.7 metric tons (39,000 lb)
Length 6.68 m (21.9 ft) with gun
5.28 m (17.3 ft) without gun
Width 2.87 m (9.4 ft)
Height 2.57 m (8.4 ft)
Crew 5 (Commander, gunner, loader, driver, co-driver)

Armor 5 to 25 mm (0.2 to 1.0 in)
76 mm AT M1A2 gun
45 rounds
1 .50 caliber (12.7 mm) Browning M2HB machine gun
800 rounds
Engine Continental R-975-C4, 9-cylinder, radial piston gasoline engine
400 hp (298 kW)
Power/weight 22.6 hp/t
Suspension Torsion bar
168 km (105 mi)
Speed up to 88 km/h (55 mph)

The M18 Hellcat (also known as the M18 Gun Motor Carriage , M18 GMC) was an American tank destroyer of World War II, used in the Italian and European theatres. It was the fastest armored vehicle in the American defense inventory of the 20th century, until the turboshaft-powered M1 Abrams heavy main battle tank appeared decades later.[1] Even though most sources including WorldHeritage list the M1 Abrams with a top speed of only 45 mph (governed speed) thus leaving the hellcat with a superior standard on road operating speed. The speed was attained by keeping armor to a minimum, no more than one inch thick and roofless, open-top turrets, and by powering the relatively small vehicle with a radial engine originally designed for aircraft usage. The Hellcat, along with the M4 Sherman-based M10 Wolverine and M36 tank destroyer, provided American and Allied forces with a respectable mobile anti-tank capability against the newer German armored types. Despite being armed with an only partially effective 76 mm cannon,[2] it performed well.

The Hellcat holds the record for most effective American tank destroyer during World War II. It has a higher kill to loss ratio than any tank or tank destroyer fielded by American forces in World War II.[3][4]


  • Development 1
  • Design 2
    • Maneuver capability 2.1
    • Variants 2.2
    • Production 2.3
  • Combat performance 3
    • Use in the Pacific Theatre 3.1
    • Use in Europe 3.2
    • Notable battles 3.3
    • Combat tactics 3.4
  • Tank destroyer doctrine 4
  • Post war 5
  • Variants 6
  • See also 7
  • Notes 8
  • References 9
  • External links 10


In December 1941, the Ordnance Corps issued a requirement for the design of a fast tank destroyer using Christie suspension, the Wright-Continental R-975 radial engine, and a 37 mm gun. Two pilot vehicles were to be built.[5]

The M18 originated in the design studio of Harley Earl from the Buick motor company division of General Motors, whose team also worked extensively on early camouflage paint.

Buick engineers developed an innovative Torsion bar suspension that provided a steady ride.[6] The Germans had developed a similar torsion bar suspension for their tanks such as the Tiger as early as at least 1939, though it is unknown if the Buick engineers copied the technology from German tanks captured by the allies in North Africa. Though it weighed about 20 tons, the Hellcat was capable of traveling upwards of 60 mph. Its power came from a nine-cylinder, 450-horsepower radial-type aircraft engine paired with a three-speed Hydramatic transmission.

Changes to the specification mean that the first pilot - the T49 GMC - was built with the British (57 mm) QF 6-pounder gun instead of the 37 mm and torsion suspension instead of Christie. It was tested in 1942 but the army wanted a heavier gun - the same 75 mm gun M3 as used on the M4 Sherman medium tank. The T49 project was cancelled and the second pilot was built with the 75 mm gun as the T67 GMC. This met approval but in early 1943 the army requested a more powerful gun - the 76 mm gun M1 under development for the Sherman. Six pilot models - as the T70 GMC - were built with this gun. The trials of these led to a new turret and changes to the hull front but the design was otherwise accepted for production which began in mid-1943.[5]

Once developed, the Hellcat was tested in the same manner as passenger cars before and after it, at the General Motors Milford Proving Ground. Top speed testing was done on a paved, banked oval and ride quality tests were done over specially developed stretches of bumps. The M18 also required additional tests of its ability to ford six feet of water, climb small walls, and ram through structures.

The first models of the tank destroyer were tested by the US Army 704th Tank Destroyer Battalion. The unit had originally been trained on the M3 Gun Motor Carriage (a 75 mm gun installed in the bed of an M3 half-track). Despite its T70 prototypes requiring several improvements, the 704th strategic testing of the Hellcat prototypes proved "superlative", and the unit was later issued production Hellcats after many of their suggestions were integrated into the vehicle. The testing phase of the Hellcat proved that teamwork was an essential element of the new light tank destroyer units, and replaced the fixed, rigid structure of other units with a much more flexible command structure that allowed adapting to more complicated tasks.[7]

Production of the M18 Hellcat began in mid-1943 and ended in October 1944. The project was so secretive that a story about the “new” tank destroyer ran in newspapers just a month before production.


The M18's new design incorporated several labor saving and innovative maintenance features. The Wright R-975 engine was mounted on steel rollers that allowed maintenance crews to disconnect it easily from the transmission, roll it out onto the lowered engine rear cover, service it, and then reconnect it to the transmission. The transmission could also easily be removed and rolled out onto a front deck plate to facilitate quick inspection and repairs.

In contrast to the M10 tank destroyer, which used the chassis of the M4 Sherman, the M18 Hellcat was designed from the start to be a fast tank destroyer. As a result it was smaller, lighter, more comfortable, and significantly faster, but carried the same gun as the Sherman 76 mm models. The M18 carried a five-man crew as well as 45 rounds of main gun ammunition, and an M2 Browning machine gun on a flexible ring mount for use against aircraft and infantry.

The main disadvantages of the M18 were its very light armor, and the inconsistent performance of its 76 mm gun against the frontal armor of later German designs such as the Tiger and Panther. The open-topped turret—a characteristic which it shared with nearly all fully tracked American tank destroyers—left the crew exposed to snipers, grenades, and shell fragments. The doctrinal priority of high speed at the cost of armor protection thus led to a relatively unbalanced design. The problem of the main gun performance was remedied with High Velocity Armor Piercing (HVAP) ammunition late in the war, which allowed the 76 mm gun to achieve greater frontal armor penetration, but this was never available in quantity. The HVAP ammunition made it possible for the 76mm to penetrate the frontal turret armor of Panther tanks at somewhat close range, giving it a possibility of effectively engaging some of the heavier German tanks.[8]

The 76mm guns were also known to produce blinding blasts of dust when fired, and often required the commander to tell the gunner where the shells had impacted. The original guns were often shipped without muzzle brakes, which caused the issue itself.[8]

M18 Hellcat of the 824th Tank Destroyer Battalion in action at Wiesloch, Germany, April 1945.

Maneuver capability

While the M18 was capable of high road speeds this attribute was difficult to use successfully in combat, but along with the high top speed was a commensurate ability to accelerate rapidly and change direction rather quickly.[9] Although sustained travel at road speeds was hardly ever used outside of the Allied response during the Battle of the Bulge,[9] most Hellcat crews found the higher speeds especially useful in a sprint to flank German tanks, which had relatively slow turret traverse speeds, and such maneuvering allowed the tank destroyer crew a shot instead into the enemy's thinner side or rear armor.

In general, Hellcat crews were complimentary of their vehicle's performance and capabilities, but did complain that the open top created a cold interior in the Northern European winter of 1944–45.[9] This problem was not helped by the fact that the air-cooled engine pulled a percentage of its cooling air through the crew compartment, creating in effect, a large armor-plated refrigerator. It was not designed to do so, but it proved impossible to seal off the crew compartment entirely from engine induced drafts.

Armored Utility Vehicle M39 in Korea, 1952.


The only M18 variant which was produced in significant numbers was the M39 Armored Utility Vehicle, a turretless variation used to transport personnel or cargo or as a gun tractor. This version was armed with a single M2 machine gun on a flexible mount. 650 early production M18s were converted into M39s by removing the turret and fitting seats for up to eight men in the open fighting space.[10] M39s saw combat during the Korean War, primarily as armored personnel carriers and munitions carriers, and were finally declared obsolete on February 14, 1957.[11] About 100 M39s were transferred to the West German Bundeswehr in 1956, where they were used to train the reestablished Panzergrenadier armored infantry units.[12]


The M18 continued in production until October 1944, when the war was nearing its end. 2,507 had been produced by that time, at a unit cost of $57,500. Though all tank destroyer units were disbanded by the U.S. after the war, surplus M18s continued to see limited service.

Combat performance

The M18 served primarily in Western Europe, but was also present in the Pacific.

Use in the Pacific Theatre

When the Americans entered the war in 1941, they began to supply China with armored vehicles, including the M18 Hellcat when they became available. These, along with M3 Stuarts and M4 Shermans, trickled in through Burma and formed part of the several well-equipped, well-trained armies that the Chinese Nationalists deployed. These units were instrumental in stopping numerous Japanese attacks during the later phases of the war. However, due to the comparative rarity and poor quality of Japanese armor the M18 was often used in a fire support role instead of as a tank destroyer.

Use in Europe

The T70 prototype for the M18 first saw combat at Anzio, Italy, and production versions of the M18 were used in North-West Europe and Italy from the summer of 1944 onwards. The tank destroyers were attached in platoon size units to American Infantry Divisions.

Notable battles

On September 19, 1944, in the platoon of C Company to Rechicourt-la-Petite, on the way to Moncourt. He saw a German tank gun muzzle appearing out of the fog 30 feet away, and deployed his platoon. In a five-minute period, five German tanks of the 113th Panzer Brigade were knocked out for the loss of one M18. The platoon continued to fire and destroyed ten more German tanks while losing another two M18s. One of the platoon's M18s commanded by Sgt Henry R. Hartman knocked out six of the German tanks, most of which were the much-feared Panthers.[13]

The M18 Hellcat was a key element during World War II in the

  • 76mm Gun Motor Carriage M18 (with photos) - AFV Database
  • Armored Utility Vehicle M39 - AFV Database
  • M18 Tank Destroyer, Hellcat - World War II Vehicles (photos and video)
  • (Utah), 3 July 2008Daily Herald"WWII tank to join in parade" -
  •, a website dedicated to the history and preservation of the M18 Hellcat
  • (Web based United States tank destroyer forces information resource)

External links

  • Zaloga, Steven J (2004), M18 Hellcat Tank Destroyer 1943-97, New Vanguard, Osprey,  
  • TM 9-2800
  • SNL G163
  • TM 9-755
  • TM 9-1725
  • TM 9-1731G
  • TM 9-1750D
  • TM 9-1755A
  • TM 9-1755B
  • TM 9-1826B
  • TM 9-1828A
  • TM 9-1829A
  • (Web based United States tank destroyer forces information resource)


  1. ^ Zaloga, Steven J, M18 Hellcat Tank Destroyer 1943-97, p. 14,  
  2. ^ Weapons of the Tankers By Harry Yeide. P.61
  3. ^ Military Channel, Program "Tank Overhaul" 22:51, Wednesday 13 August 2008 (UTC) "Current hour EDST," mixed documentary with interviews of WW-II veterans
  4. ^ Patton's Vanguard: The United States Army Fourth Armored Division, By Don M. Fox. P.25
  5. ^ a b Chamberlain & Ellis (1969) p147
  6. ^ the torsion bar suspension was used for two other American tanks of the late-war era, the M24 Light Tank and the M26 Pershing
  7. ^ Patton's Vanguard: The United States Army Fourth Armored Division By Don M. Fox. P.26
  8. ^ a b Weapons of the Tankers By Harry Yeide. P61.
  9. ^ a b c d e f g Military Channel, Program "Tank Overhaul" 22:51, Wednesday 13 August 2008 (UTC) "Current hour EDST," mixed documentary with interviews of WW-II veterans.
  10. ^ Steven J. Zaloga, M18 Hellcat Tank Destroyer 1943-97, pp. 11–12. ISBN 1-84176-687-9
  11. ^ Zaloga p. 43.
  12. ^ Tankograd Militarfahrzeug Spezial No 5002 "Die Anfangsjahre des Heeres 1956–1966 (The Early Years of the Modern German Army)" by Peter Blume PP48-49. No ISBN number
  13. ^ "Tank Action" by George Forty P195.ISBN 0-7509-0479-8
  14. ^ Military Channel, Tank Overhaul, "The Hellcat," (2006), aired October 5, 2007, 10:00am MDT
  15. ^ Patton's Vanguard: The United States Army Fourth Armored Division By Don M. Fox P.25-26
  16. ^ "Tank Tactics: From Normandy to Lorraine" by Roman Jarymowycz, Ch. 5 Creating North American Panzer Armies
  17. ^ Radic, Aleksandar (15 February 2008). "Историја - Крајина експрес". Aрсенал magazine (in Serb) (14): 51–54. Retrieved 20 January 2015. 


See also

All work on the three amphibious models was canceled after the end of the war.

The T86 vehicles had shown that track propulsion was better and this was used for the T87 which had the same 105 mm T12 howitzer of the T88.
  • 105 mm Howitzer Motor Carriage T87 (Amphibious)
M18 with a much larger and lightweight flotation hull, using its tracks for water propulsion. The T86E1 variant test vehicle used propellers for propulsion.
  • 90 mm Cannon Motor Gun Carriage: M18 with the 76 mm gun replaced with a 90 mm Cannon; cancelled after the end of the war
  • 76 mm Gun Motor Carriage T86 (Amphibious)
M18 with the 76 mm gun replaced with a 105 mm T12 howitzer. A pilot was built in 1944 but project cancelled after the end of the war.
  • 105 mm Howitzer Motor Carriage T88


An M18 is on display at the Army Heritage and Education Center in Carlisle, PA. Another M18 is on display at the Military Museum of Southern New England in Danbury CT.

The Venezuelan military still operates M18s, with 75 still in reserve service. An unknown number of these vehicles were modernized by a Yugoslavian firm in 1991.

The Military of the Republic of China also operated several M18s until their chassis and hulls were worn out, at which point the turrets were salvaged and installed onto surplus hulls of M42 Duster anti-aircraft vehicles to produce Type 64 light tanks.

After World War II, many M18s were sold to other countries. These were rebuilt and refurbished by Brown & Root in northern Italy in the late 1940s and early 1950s, and bear data plates that indicate those rebuilds. One of the users was Yugoslavia, which kept them in reserve until the early 1990s. A number of these vehicles were later used by the Military of Serbian Krajina and Army of Republika Srpska during the Yugoslav wars. One example was used on an armored train named the "Krajina express" (Krajina Ekspres).[17]

Post war

Prewar expectation was that all anti-tank work was supposed to be done by tank-destroyer crews, because attacking tanks could concentrate against a small part of a defending line. Independent tank destroyer groups were to counter concentrate, to stop enemy tanks from penetrating deeply. Speed was essential in order to bring the Hellcats from the rear to destroy incoming tanks. Obviously this would make it harder for an armored force to achieve a deep breakthrough, a main objective of armor. It would also be easier for an opposing armored force to achieve a local breakthrough against an American unit which would not have all of its anti-tank assets at the front during the beginning of any attack. This doctrine was not entirely used as it would create a small window of time of weakness in the armored battalion until tank destroyers moved to the front. Tank destroyer battalions assigned to front line divisions often split up to companies attached to regiments, and platoons attached to infantry battalions. When so attached, defending tank destroyer units supplemented organic antitank weapons (bazookas and 57mm towed guns).[16]

In practice a tank destroyer battalion was assigned nearly permanently to a division and would move toward an enemy penetration from local assembly areas. The doctrine of the time had Shermans acting in support of infantry to break enemy defenses (infantry leads, tanks follow or support by fire), and then exploiting the attack (tanks lead, infantry follows) with infantry in support during exploitation.

This doctrine failed on the battlefield where attacking Sherman tanks ran into defending German tanks far more often than intended and the tank destroyers were called in to assist. Tank destroyers were often deployed to attack enemy armor at long range from an ambush position, taking on the role of self-propelled anti-tank guns. During the battle for Italy, tank destroyers compensated for a shortage of 155mm artillery ammunition by using their 3 inch or 76mm guns in indirect fire role. Near the end of the war, there were so few German tanks that tank destroyers were increasingly used as self-propelled artillery in support of infantry for lack of any other targets.

American prewar armored doctrine was based on the assumption that enemy armored attacks would be delivered at a time and place of the enemy's choosing against an American defense. Similarly, American armored attacks would be delivered at a time and place of friendly forces choosing against an enemy defense. For this, the U.S. envisioned using tanks in the attack solely in a support and exploitation role, usually in conjunction with infantry. Tank destroyers, such as the Hellcat, were to be used against tanks that had already penetrated the front lines. The Hellcat was not intended to engage in protracted combat but to quickly respond to breakthroughs in the line by enemy armor. To aid these purposes, it was designed with light armor and extremely high speeds. U.S. doctrine originally called for the Hellcat to be held in reserves so that it could block an incoming armored thrust.

Tank destroyer doctrine

This tactic was effective enough that it is sometimes credited with allowing the Hellcat to become the most deadly tank killer of the war.[15]

The Hellcat had a gun that could penetrate roughly 88 mm (3.5 in) of armor at 2,000 m (2,200 yd). This was enough to penetrate a Panzer IV medium tank frontally, but not enough to deal with the newer Panther or Tiger from the front. The average combat range noted by the Americans for tank vs. tank action was around 800 to 900 m (2,600 to 3,000 ft). If facing a Panther, a Hellcat would be facing a tank with roughly 140 mm (5.5 in) of line-of-sight armor frontally that could not be pierced at any range, with a 100 mm (3.9 in) mantlet that could be pierced only at suicidally close range. However, the 76 mm gun could knock out the Panther with relative ease from the flanks and rear, as the turret and side armor was weak and the quality of German armor plate declined in the last two years of the war. While Panthers in defense were formidable, Panthers in the attack had great difficulty with not exposing their vulnerable large side profiles. Tank destroyer tactics often employed the use of a Hull down profile. This allowed the tank destroyer to remain mostly behind cover. After emerging from cover and engaging the enemy, the tank destroyer would then use its speed to change positions, while other tank destroyers took turns engaging the enemy.

Combat tactics

The attack of 1st Battalion and the M18 Hellcat tank destroyers of the 705th TD Battalion near Noville together destroyed at least 30 German tanks and inflicted 500 to 1,000 casualties on the attacking forces, in what amounted to a spoiling attack. A Military Channel historian credited the M18 destroyers with 24 kills, including several Tiger tanks, and believes that in part, their ability to "shoot and scoot" at high speed and then reappear elsewhere on the battlefield, confused and slowed the German attack, which finally stalled, leaving the Americans in control of the town overnight.[9]

An M39 carrier used in the Korean War.

[9] wherein the top speed of the M18 Hellcat - 55 miles per hour (89 km/h) - was actually used to get ahead of an enemy force.[9]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.