World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Inter-paradigm debate in international relations theory

Article Id: WHEBN0024743474
Reproduction Date:

Title: Inter-paradigm debate in international relations theory  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: International relations theory, Constructivism (international relations), Critical international relations theory, Feminism (international relations), Securitization (international relations)
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Inter-paradigm debate in international relations theory

The inter paradigm debate in international relations theory refers to the academic debate between proponents of realism, liberalism and Marxist approaches to international relations theory. This academic debate was topical during the 1970s and 1980s.[1]

Criticism

Some scholars have lamented the so-called "paradigm wars", particularly between (neo)realism and (neo)liberalism. Jack S. Levy argues that while the realism-liberalism debate "has imposed some order on a chaotic field," the distinction ignores diversity within each of the two camps and inhibits attempts at synthesis. Levy suggests instead focusing on making testable predictions and leaving "the question of whether a particular approach fits into a liberal or realist framework to the intellectual historians."[2] Bear F. Braumoeller likewise proposes that the "temporary theoretical convenience" of separating realism and liberalism "was transformed into ossified ontology" that inhibited attempts at theoretical synthesis. Socialization also leads to a situation where "scholars working primarily within one paradigm who attempt [to combine paradigms] are likely to be chastised for theoretical impurity".[3]

References

  1. ^ http://www.oup.com/uk/orc/bin/9780199298334/01student/guide/ch01/
  2. ^ Levy, Jack S. (Jun 1998). "The Causes of War and the Conditions of Peace". Annual Review of Political Science 1: 139–165.  
  3. ^ Braumoeller, Bear F. (2009). "Rediscovering Complexity and Synthesis". The Future of Political Science: 100 Perspectives (1 ed.). New York: Routledge Press.  

See also

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.