#jsDisabledContent { display:none; } My Account | Register | Help

# Causality conditions

Article Id: WHEBN0014346663
Reproduction Date:

 Title: Causality conditions Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia Language: English Subject: Collection: Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia Publication Date:

### Causality conditions

In the study of Lorentzian manifold spacetimes there exists a hierarchy of causality conditions which are important in proving mathematical theorems about the global structure of such manifolds. These conditions were collected during the late 1970s.[1]

The weaker the causality condition on a spacetime, the more unphysical the spacetime is. Spacetimes with closed timelike curves, for example, present severe interpretational difficulties. See the grandfather paradox.

It is reasonable to believe that any physical spacetime will satisfy the strongest causality condition: global hyperbolicity. For such spacetimes the equations in general relativity can be posed as an initial value problem on a Cauchy surface.

## The hierarchy

There is a hierarchy of causality conditions, each one of which is strictly stronger than the previous. This is sometimes called the causal ladder. The conditions, from weakest to strongest, are:

• Non-totally vicious
• Chronological
• Causal
• Distinguishing
• Strongly causal
• Stably causal
• Causally continuous
• Causally simple
• Globally hyperbolic

Given are the definitions of these causality conditions for a Lorentzian manifold (M,g). Where two or more are given they are equivalent.

Notation:

(See causal structure for definitions of \,I^+(x), \,I^-(x) and \,J^+(x), \,J^-(x).)

## Non-totally vicious

• For some points p \in M we have p \not\ll p.

## Causal

• There are no closed causal (non-spacelike) curves.
• If both p \prec q and q \prec p then p = q

## Distinguishing

### Past-distinguishing

• Two points p, q \in M which share the same chronological past are the same point:
I^-(p) = I^-(q) \implies p = q
• For any neighborhood U of p \in M there exists a neighborhood V \subset U, p \in V such that no past-directed non-spacelike curve from p intersects V more than once.

### Future-distinguishing

• Two points p, q \in M which share the same chronological future are the same point:

I^+(p) = I^+(q) \implies p = q

• For any neighborhood U of p \in M there exists a neighborhood V \subset U, p \in V such that no future-directed non-spacelike curve from p intersects V more than once.

## Strongly causal

• For any p \in M there exists a neighborhood U of p such that there exists no timelike curve that passes through U more than once.
• For any neighborhood U of p \in M there exists a neighborhood V \subset U, p \in V such that V is causally convex in M (and thus in U).
• The Alexandrov topology agrees with the manifold topology.

## Stably causal

A manifold satisfying any of the weaker causality conditions defined above may fail to do so if the metric is given a small perturbation. A spacetime is stably causal if it cannot be made to contain closed causal curves by arbitrarily small perturbations of the metric. Stephen Hawking showed[2] that this is equivalent to:

• There exists a global time function on M. This is a scalar field t on M whose gradient \nabla^a t is everywhere timelike and future-directed. This global time function gives us a stable way to distinguish between future and past for each point of the spacetime (and so we have no causal violations).

## Globally hyperbolic

Robert Geroch showed[3] that a spacetime is globally hyperbolic if and only if there exists a Cauchy surface for M. This means that:

• M is topologically equivalent to \mathbb{R} \times\!\, S for some Cauchy surface S (Here \mathbb{R} denotes the real line).

## References

1. ^ E. Minguzzi and M. Sanchez, The causal hierarchy of spacetimes in H. Baum and D. Alekseevsky (eds.), vol. Recent developments in pseudo-Riemannian geometry, ESI Lect. Math. Phys., (Eur. Math. Soc. Publ. House, Zurich, 2008), pp. 299–358, ISBN=978-3-03719-051-7, arXiv:gr-qc/0609119
2. ^ S.W. Hawking, The existence of cosmic time functions Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (1969), A308, 433
3. ^ R. Geroch, Domain of Dependence J. Math. Phys. (1970) 11, 437–449
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.

Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.