World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Authoritarian democracy

Article Id: WHEBN0034480696
Reproduction Date:

Title: Authoritarian democracy  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Fascism, Athenian democracy, Representative democracy, Democracy, Grassroots democracy
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Authoritarian democracy

Authoritarian democracy is a form of [2][3] In use for cases of fascism and Stalinism it has also been referred to as totalitarian democracy.[4][5]

Authoritarian democracy was first developed and used by Bonapartism.[6] The Bonapartist conception of authoritarian democracy was based upon Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès' maxim: "confidence from below, authority from above" that Sieyès claimed must be an enlightened authority that is responsive to the needs and clamour of the people.[7][8]

Authoritarian democracy was promoted by fascists who presented fascism as a form of authoritarian democracy, it explicitly rejects the conventional concept of [3]

Variants

Fascist and quasi-fascist

Fascist movements advocate a form of democracy that advocates the rule of the most qualified, rather than rule by a majority of numbers.[12]

Maurice Barrès, who greatly influenced the policies of fascism, claimed that true democracy was authoritarian democracy while rejecting liberal democracy as a fraud.[13] Barrès claimed that authoritarian democracy involved spiritual connection between a leader of a nation and the nation's people, and that true freedom did not arise from individual rights nor parliamentary restraints, but through "heroic leadership" and "national power".[13]

In the fascist and quasi-fascist regimes that governed Italy, Romania, and Spain from the 1920s to the 1970s, authoritarian democracy was promoted as an alternative to liberal democracy, multi-party based democracy was dismantled and replaced by corporatist representation of state-sanctioned corporate groups that would unite people into interest groups to address the state that would act in the interest of the general will of the nation and thus exercise an orderly form of popular rule.[14] Italian Fascists argued that this authoritarian democracy is capable of representing the different interests of society that advise the state and the state acts in the interest of the nation.[15] In contrast, fascists denounced liberal democracy for not being a true democracy but in fact being un-democratic because from the fascist perspective, elections and parliaments are unable to represent the interests of the nation because it lumps together individuals who have little in common into geographical districts to vote for an array of parties to represent them that results in little unanimity in terms of interests, projects, or intentions, and that liberal democracy's multi-party elections merely serve as a means to legitimize elite rule without addressing the interests of the general will of the nation.[15]

Hitler denounced parliamentary and pluralistic electoral democracy but he repeatedly invoked democracy to describe Nazism, and called for a "German democracy", once saying "National Socialism is the true realization of democracy" and another time saying "We wild Germans are better democrats than other nations".[16] Nazi Germany's propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels described Nazism as an "authoritarian democracy" on 31 May 1933 in a speech before the press.[17] Nazi political theorist Walter Gerhart affirmed the concept of authoritarian democracy as being able to link authority with the people's will that would be the anti-thesis of liberal democracy that he claimed lacked authority and divided people in an atomistic society.[11] Jacob Talmon identifies as Nazism as promoting a "totalitarian democracy", while W. Martini identifies it as a "hyper-democracy".[5] What W. Martini claims is that the Nazi regime appealed directly to the masses without institutional and social checks and balances of liberal democracy.[5]

References

  1. ^ a b c Anthony Arblaster. "Democracy", Concepts in social thought.Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA: University of Minnesota Press, 1994. Pp. 48.
  2. ^ Blamires, Cyprian, World Fascism: a Historical Encyclopedia, Volume 1 (Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, Inc., 2006) p. 232.
  3. ^ a b Martin Blinkhorn. Fascists and conservatives: the radical right and the establishment in twentieth-century Europe. Routledge, 1990, 2003. Pp. 144.
  4. ^ Jacob Leib Talmon, Yehoshua Arieli, Nathan Rotenstreich. Totalitarian democracy and after. London, England, UK; Portland, Oregon, USA: FRANK CASS PUBLISHERS, 2002. Pp. 174.
  5. ^ a b c Roland N. Stromberg. Democracy: a short, analytical history. Armonk, New York, USA: M.E. Sharpe, 1996. Pp. 94.
  6. ^ John Alexander Murray Rothney. Bonapartism after Sedan. Cornell University Press, 1969. Pp. 293.
  7. ^ Front Cover William Herbert Cecil Smith. Second Empire and Commune: France, 1848-1871. Longman, 1996. Pp. 12.
  8. ^ Geoffrey Bruun. Europe and the French imperium, 1799-1814. Harper & Row, 1965. Pp. 68.
  9. ^ . "The Bohemian Background of German National Socialism: The D.A.P., D.N.S.A.P. and N.S.D.A.P." by Erik R. Von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 9, No. 3 (Jun., 1948), pp. 339-371. Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2707374 Accessed on JSTOR on 5 March 2012. "Nazi Germany's propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels described Nazism as an "authoritarian democracy" on 31 May 1933 in a speech before the press."
  10. ^ Blamires, Cyprian, World Fascism: a Historical Encyclopedia, Volume 1 (Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, Inc., 2006) p. 589.
  11. ^ a b Donald J. Dietrich. Catholic citizens in the Third Reich: psycho-social principles and moral reasoning. New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA: Transaction Publishers, 1988. Pp. 113.
  12. ^ Alexander Rudhart. Twentieth century Europe. Lippincott, 1975. Pp. 444.
  13. ^ a b "Barres and Fascism" by Robert Soucy, French Historical Studies , Vol. 5, No. 1 (Spring, 1967), pp. 67-97. Duke University Press. Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/285867 Pp. 87-90
  14. ^ Dylan J. Riley. The civic foundations of fascism in Europe: Italy, Spain, and Romania, 1870-1945. Pp. 4-5.
  15. ^ a b Dylan J. Riley. The civic foundations of fascism in Europe: Italy, Spain, and Romania, 1870-1945. Pp. 4.
  16. ^ Roland N. Stromberg. Democracy: a short, analytical history. Armonk, New York, USA: M.E. Sharpe, 1996. Pp. 93-94.
  17. ^ . "The Bohemian Background of German National Socialism: The D.A.P., D.N.S.A.P. and N.S.D.A.P." by Erik R. Von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 9, No. 3 (Jun., 1948), pp. 339-371. Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2707374 Accessed on JSTOR on 5 March 2012.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.