World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture

Article Id: WHEBN0000144854
Reproduction Date:

Title: International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Biodiversity, Livestock Keepers' Rights, Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, 2001 in Italy, Free, prior and informed consent
Collection: 2001 in Italy, Agricultural Treaties, Biodiversity, Food and Agriculture Organization Treaties, Food Security, Food Treaties, Intellectual Property Treaties, Treaties Concluded in 2001, Treaties Entered Into by the European Union, Treaties Entered Into Force in 2004, Treaties Establishing Intergovernmental Organizations, Treaties Extended to Aruba, Treaties Extended to Greenland, Treaties Extended to the Faroe Islands, Treaties Extended to the Netherlands Antilles, Treaties of Afghanistan, Treaties of Albania, Treaties of Algeria, Treaties of Angola, Treaties of Armenia, Treaties of Australia, Treaties of Austria, Treaties of Bangladesh, Treaties of Belgium, Treaties of Benin, Treaties of Bhutan, Treaties of Brazil, Treaties of Brunei, Treaties of Bulgaria, Treaties of Burkina Faso, Treaties of Burundi, Treaties of Cambodia, Treaties of Cameroon, Treaties of Canada, Treaties of Chad, Treaties of Costa Rica, Treaties of Croatia, Treaties of Cuba, Treaties of Cyprus, Treaties of Denmark, Treaties of Djibouti, Treaties of Ecuador, Treaties of Egypt, Treaties of El Salvador, Treaties of Eritrea, Treaties of Estonia, Treaties of Ethiopia, Treaties of Fiji, Treaties of Finland, Treaties of France, Treaties of Gabon, Treaties of Germany, Treaties of Ghana, Treaties of Greece, Treaties of Guatemala, Treaties of Guinea, Treaties of Guinea-Bissau, Treaties of Honduras, Treaties of Hungary, Treaties of Iceland, Treaties of India, Treaties of Indonesia, Treaties of Iran, Treaties of Iraq, Treaties of Ireland, Treaties of Italy, Treaties of Ivory Coast, Treaties of Jamaica, Treaties of Japan, Treaties of Jordan, Treaties of Kenya, Treaties of Kiribati, Treaties of Kuwait, Treaties of Kyrgyzstan, Treaties of Laos, Treaties of Latvia, Treaties of Lebanon, Treaties of Lesotho, Treaties of Liberia, Treaties of Liechtenstein, Treaties of Lithuania, Treaties of Luxembourg, Treaties of Madagascar, Treaties of Malawi, Treaties of Malaysia, Treaties of Mali, Treaties of Mauritania, Treaties of Mauritius, Treaties of Moldova, Treaties of Montenegro, Treaties of Morocco, Treaties of Myanmar, Treaties of Namibia, Treaties of Nepal, Treaties of Nicaragua, Treaties of Niger, Treaties of North Korea, Treaties of Norway, Treaties of Oman, Treaties of Pakistan, Treaties of Palau, Treaties of Panama, Treaties of Papua New Guinea, Treaties of Paraguay, Treaties of Peru, Treaties of Poland, Treaties of Portugal, Treaties of Qatar, Treaties of Romania, Treaties of Rwanda, Treaties of Saint Lucia, Treaties of Samoa, Treaties of São Tomé and Príncipe, Treaties of Saudi Arabia, Treaties of Senegal, Treaties of Serbia, Treaties of Seychelles, Treaties of Sierra Leone, Treaties of Singapore, Treaties of Slovakia, Treaties of Slovenia, Treaties of South Korea, Treaties of Spain, Treaties of Sri Lanka, Treaties of Swaziland, Treaties of Sweden, Treaties of Switzerland, Treaties of Syria, Treaties of Tanzania, Treaties of the Central African Republic, Treaties of the Cook Islands, Treaties of the Czech Republic, Treaties of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Treaties of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Treaties of the Maldives, Treaties of the Marshall Islands, Treaties of the Netherlands, Treaties of the Philippines, Treaties of the Republic of the Congo, Treaties of the Republic of the Sudan (1985–2011), Treaties of the United Arab Emirates, Treaties of the United Kingdom, Treaties of Togo, Treaties of Tonga, Treaties of Trinidad and Tobago, Treaties of Tunisia, Treaties of Turkey, Treaties of Uganda, Treaties of Uruguay, Treaties of Venezuela, Treaties of Yemen, Treaties of Zambia, Treaties of Zimbabwe
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture

The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (IT PGRFA),[1] popularly known as the International Seed Treaty, is a comprehensive international agreement in harmony with the Convention on Biological Diversity, which aims at guaranteeing food security through the conservation, exchange and sustainable use of the world's plant genetic resources for food and agriculture (PGRFA), as well as the fair and equitable benefit sharing arising from its use. It also recognises Farmers' Rights, subject to national laws to: a) the protection of traditional knowledge relevant to plant genetic resources for food and agriculture; b) the right to equitably participate in sharing benefits arising from the utilisation of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture; and c) the right to participate in making decisions, at the national level, on matters related to the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. The Treaty establishes the Multilateral System of Access and Benefit-sharing to facilitate plant germplasm exchanges and benefit sharing through Standard Material Transfer Agreement (SMTA).

However, as Regine Anderson of the farmers' rights project,[2] among others, including Olivier De Schutter, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food,[3] argue, the interpretation and realisation of farmers' rights is weak and is not the same across all countries. Without a consistent, strong international focus on the realising the rights of farmers who conserve and sustainably use PGRFA to save, use, exchange and sell seeds saved on-farm, genetic variety of crops and related agricultural biodiversity will suffer.[4] India, for example, includes an interpretation of farmers' rights in its Plant Variety Protection and Farmers' Rights Act, allowing farmers a restricted right to save and sell seed they have produced on-farm as they always have, even if it contains genes from a protected variety.,[5][6]

The treaty has implemented a Multilateral System (MLS) of access and benefit sharing, among those countries that ratify the treaty, for a list of 64 of some of the most important food and forage crops essential for food security and interdependence. The genera and species are listed in Annex 1 to the treaty.

The treaty was negotiated by the

Some believe the treaty could be an example of responsible global governance for ensuring that plant genetic resources essential for present and future food security can be kept accessible to all farmers and in the public domain. Chapter 7 of the Second Report on the State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (SoWPGR-2)[7] entitled "Access to Plant Genetic Resources, the sharing of benefits arising out of their utilization and the realization of Farmers’ Rights" is mainly dedicated to the International Treaty.


  • Sessions of the Governing Body 1
  • Negotiations and entry into force 2
  • Discussion 3
  • Participating countries 4
  • List of crops covered in Annex 1 5
  • See also 6
  • References 7
  • Further reading 8
  • External links 9

Sessions of the Governing Body

  • The Governing Body met for the first time in Madrid in June 2006.[8] It had a ministerial segment and a ministerial declaration was adopted and included in the Report.[9]
  • The Second Session of the Governing Body was held in Rome in October/November 2007.[10] This meeting discussed the implementation of Farmers' Rights, financial rules; the funding strategy, relationship with the Global Crop Diversity Trust; implementation of the Multilateral System (MLS) for access and benefit-sharing, among other issues.[11]
  • The Third Session of the Governing Body was held in Tunis in June 2009.[12] This meeting continued the unfinished business of the previous meeting and discussed, among other issues, funding strategy, compliance, sustainable use, the implementation of Farmers' Rights, relationship with the Global Crop Diversity Trust and the CGRFA, implementation of the Multilateral System (MLS) for access and benefit-sharing.[13]
  • The Fourth Session of the Governing Body was held in Bali, Indonesia in March 2011.[14] Prior to the Governing Body meeting, Ministers adopted the Bali Declaration on the Treaty [15] that commits them to engage in further enhancing Treaty implementation to help meet the challenges of agricultural biodiversity erosion, food insecurity, extreme poverty and the effects of climate change; and calls upon parties and relevant stakeholders to prioritize activities relevant to the MLS, sustainable use of PGRFA, and Farmers’ Rights, and to mobilize more funds. With the addition of 'compliance' mechanisms and financial rules, these issues took up most negotiating time in the Governing Body meeting. The relationship of the Treaty with the CGRFA, the CBD's Nagoya Protocol, the Global Crop Diversity Trust and Biodiversity International were also included in resolutions.
  • The Fifth Session of the Governing Body was held in Muscat, Oman in September 2013.[16] The session was preceded by two days of regional consultations. The Fifth Session achieved: • a good resolution on Farmers' Rights (FRs), which renewed the commitment of governments to implement Farmers' Rights ; • a coded call to UPOV and WIPO to report on their impacts on Farmers' Rights ; • warm acceptance of the offer by Farmers' Organisations to produce a report for GB6 on the state of implementation of Farmers' Rights ; • actions designed to improve the sustainable use of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, linked to commitments to realise Farmers' Rights ; • commitments to review and change the multi-lateral Access and Benefit Sharing mechanism (MLS), to prevent pillaging of the System by patents on native traits, for example ; • significant new voluntary financial contributions from Norway for the Global Crop Diversity Trust and for the benefit sharing fund to support on-farm conservation ; • acceptance of the distinction between NGOs and Farmers' Organisations and the need to include representatives of farmers' social movements in negotiations ; • a request to the Secretary to report on relevant discussions that relate to Farmers' Rights within other UN fora including the Committee on World Food Security. Civil Society including NGOs (e.g. CENESTA) and the International Farmers' Movement, La Via Campesina, were active throughout the Session.[17]

Negotiations and entry into force

The treaty was under negotiation for 7 years. A previous voluntary agreement, the International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (IU), was adopted in 1983. However, the IU was reliant on the principle of genetic resources being the common heritage of humanity.[18] The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (1993) brought genetic resources under the jurisdiction and sovereignty of national governments. However, the CBD recognised the special and distinctive nature of agricultural genetic resources: they were international - crossing countries and continents - their conservation and sustainable use requires distinctive solutions and they were important internationally for food security. Subsequently the IU was renegotiated, to bring it in harmony with the CBD, and was renamed as a treaty. An account of the long process to achieve the treaty called Negotiating the Seed Treaty can be found at [1].

The treaty was approved during the FAO Conference (31st Session resolution 3/2001[19]) on 3 November 2001, with 116 votes and 2 abstentions (USA and Japan). In accordance with its Article 25, it was opened for signatures until 4 November 2002 by all members of FAO or any state member of the United Nations or of the International Atomic Energy Agency. It was subject to ratification, acceptance or approval (Article 26), by all members.

The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture was open to accession a year after adoption and once closed to signatures (Article 27), i.e., on 4 November 2002. 77 countries and the European Union had signed the treaty by that date.

In accordance with Article 28, the treaty entered into force on the ninetieth day after the deposit of the fortieth instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, provided that at least twenty instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession have been deposited by Members of FAO. Having reached the required number of instruments in order for the treaty to enter into force (40) on 31 March 2004, on which date 13 instruments (including the European Union) were deposited with the Director-General of FAO, the date of entry into force was on 29 June 2004.


Plant genetic resources are essential to a sustainable agriculture and food security. FAO estimates humans have used some 10 000 species for food throughout history. However, only about 120 cultivated species provide around 90% of food requirements and 4 species (Maize, Wheat, Rice and Potatoes) provide about 60% of human dietary energy for the world's population. Of the myriad of varieties of these crops developed by farmers over millennia, which form an important part of agricultural biodiversity, more than 75% have been lost in the past 100 years.

Some fear that corporate financial interests might prevent safeguarding of livelihoods, promotion of food security, biodiversity-rich farming under control of local communities, and implementation of Farmers' Rights.

Critics say many of the central issues are unresolved or open to interpretation. Some of the points raised are:

  • to what extent will intellectual property rights be allowed on genetic resources in the MLS, within treaty rules: some argue an agreement aiming at open access to genetic resources for food and agriculture should not allow restrictive property rights, and the treaty says in Article 12.3.d that "Recipients shall not claim any intellectual property or other rights that limit the facilitated access to the plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, or their genetic parts or components, in the form received from the Multilateral System";
  • to what extent will farmers and communities be allowed to freely use, exchange, sell and breed the seeds, and what enforcement procedures will be used by national governments to ensure principles of Farmers' Rights will be respected;
  • The mechanism for dispute settlement under the Third Party Beneficiary and the role of FAO.
  • The first group of 11 projects funded by the treaty was announced during the Third Session of the Governing Body in Tunis in June 2009. The projects were funded according to criteria established by the Governing Body including regional balance: 5 from Latin America, 5 from Africa and 1 from Asia. The ranking of the projects was done by a Group of Experts nominated by the 7 regional representatives of the Bureau and the final approval was done by the Bureau on behalf of the Governing Body.
  • while the whole Brassica family (Cruciferae) including all its sub-species and varieties is in the MLS the total number of food crops and forages and their relatives included in the treaty is very limited. Soya, sugar cane, oil palm and groundnut are among important crops missing from the list in Annex 1.

The treaty came into force on 29 June 2004 at which time there were more than 54 ratifications by countries. An article prepared on the occasion of the treaty becoming law is posted at [2]. From the entry into force, countries that previously signed are allowed to ratify the treaty, while countries that did not sign the treaty before it came into force can also accede to it. The instrument of ratification has to be deposited with the Director-General of FAO.

Participating countries

There are 136 contracting parties to the Treaty (135 states and the European Union) as of September 2015.[20]

Parties: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Angola, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Belgium, Benin, Bhutan, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Central African Republic, Chad, Republic of Congo, Cook Islands, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark, Djibouti*, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, European Union, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Kiribati*, Kuwait, Lao Peoples Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, Nicaragua, Niger, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Palau, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Romania, Rwanda, Saint Lucia, Samoa, São Tomé and Príncipe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, Tanzania, Tonga, Uruguay, Venezuela, Yemen, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.

Additional signatories to the Treaty: Argentina, Cape Verde, Chile, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Haiti, the Republic of Macedonia, Malta, Marshall Islands, Nigeria, Serbia, Thailand, United States of America.

List of crops covered in Annex 1

Even foods that have been part of a culture for centuries often are indigenous to a region on the other side of the world. This global dispersal shows the generosity with which farmers and farming communities have always shared seeds and genetic materials with neighbors or through trade. As people ventured forth, looking for new lands, their seeds were part of their diasporas. As a result, we now live in a world in which not one country can be considered self-sufficient in terms of being able to survive solely on crops indigenous within its borders. The Treaty facilitates the continued open exchange of food crops and their genetic materials.[21]

The list of plant genetic material included in the Multilateral System of the Treaty is made of major food crops and forages. The Forages are also divided in legume forages and grass forages. They were selected taking into account the criteria of food security and country interdependence.[22]

See also


  1. ^
  2. ^
  3. ^
  4. ^
  5. ^
  6. ^
  7. ^
  8. ^
  9. ^ GB-1/06/REPORT, Report of the First Session of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
  10. ^
  11. ^ GB-2/07/REPORT, Report of the Second Session of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
  12. ^
  13. ^ GB-3/09/REPORT, Report of the Third Session of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
  14. ^
  15. ^
  16. ^
  17. ^ CSO summary of results of GB5
  18. ^ Shawn N. Sullivan, 2004. Plant Genetic Resources and the Law: Past, Present, and Future. Plant Physiology May 2004 vol. 135 no. 1 10-15.
  19. ^
  20. ^ Treaty status,
  21. ^
  22. ^ Ximena Flores Palacios, 1998. Contribution to the Estimation of Countries' Inter-dependence in the Area of Plant Genetic Resources. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Background Study Paper no. 7, Rev.1, FAO.

Further reading

  • 213 p.
  • 36 p.
  • 59 p.
  • 155 p.

External links

  • Official text of the Treaty
  • Genetic Imperialism? from the Dean Peter Krogh Foreign Affairs Digital Archives
  • - Official website of the Treaty
  • - Leipzig Global Plan of Action (GPA)
  • - Portal for PGRFA issues
  • - Second Report on the State of the World's PGRFA
  • - Global Crop Diversity Trust
  • - Civil Society pages on the International Treaty and its negotiation
  • - CGIAR's agricultural biodiversity research centre's pages on the Treaty
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.